<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valentine&#8217;s Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/</link>
	<description>Wisdom about stupidity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 16:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nici</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Nici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>I mostly agree with you, Davis.  Haha...you didn&#039;t buy the whole lover bit, huh?  I do think there&#039;s a fine line between making a movie too serious and keeping it light.  It seems that it would be difficult to portrait the little relationship nuances without making a romcom heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mostly agree with you, Davis.  Haha&#8230;you didn&#8217;t buy the whole lover bit, huh?  I do think there&#8217;s a fine line between making a movie too serious and keeping it light.  It seems that it would be difficult to portrait the little relationship nuances without making a romcom heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1349</guid>
		<description>Regarding gold standards, I don&#039;t know how you can beat Sleepless in Seattle.  

My sleeper success is Two Weeks Notice.  It&#039;s not life-changing, but much more entertaining than most rom-coms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding gold standards, I don&#8217;t know how you can beat Sleepless in Seattle.  </p>
<p>My sleeper success is Two Weeks Notice.  It&#8217;s not life-changing, but much more entertaining than most rom-coms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>i confess i kinda liked the proposal.  however, i would contend that notting hill is the gold standard of romantic comedies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i confess i kinda liked the proposal.  however, i would contend that notting hill is the gold standard of romantic comedies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>Wade, The Breakup is one of the best.  Super funny, and I actually thought it was one of the few which realistically portrayed how relationships can be.  The argument about washing the dishes is one of my all time favorites.  &quot;I&#039;ll help you wash the dishes.&quot;  &quot;I want you to want to wash the dishes.&quot;  &quot;WHY WOULD I WANT TO WASH DISHES???&quot;

Braden, I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m with you on the super old movies being better.  A few of them are, but it seems like the fact that we&#039;re seeing them means time has weeded out a bunch of lame ones.

Natalie,  I knew there had to be more.  Seems like there should be more still, though.

Erin, your comment made me laugh. I&#039;m sure Judy does want to kiss Hugh Grant.  

Ryan, I hope Hitch learned the hard way that there&#039;s no substituting Judy Greer when it comes to quirky romcom friends.

Anna, now you know the smoke alarm trick.  Just make sure you&#039;re ready to defend your life.

Macy, I like your establishment of a new subgenre:  the progressive romcom.

Kook, so funny about Bugs Bunny.  I know exactly what you mean.  Anytime there was something risque on when mom and dad were in the room it felt like I had written, produced, and directed it.

Shannon, yes, you do need to say more.  I would recommend starting with the words, &quot;I&#039;m sorry.&quot;

Joyce, I remember liking French Kiss a lot.  I&#039;ll have to rent it next time my wife goes to a new, terrible romantic comedy.

Angie, the smoke alarm saved me before I saw that.  That is indeed more progressive than even 500 Days of Summer.  Can&#039;t wait for the first Matthew McConagauh/Hugh Grant gay romcom.

Jenna, I agree, critics aren&#039;t always spot on.  But there kind of all you have if you want to get an idea of what you&#039;re getting into before spending the time and money.  

Maweesa, we&#039;ll just have to agree to disagree.  Or get divorced.

Daniel, my wife came back from Dear John with &quot;crying eyes.&quot;  So it must have been pretty bad.

Norm, man, that video named about everyone that I did.  I feel like I plagiarized my post.

Nici, do you really feel like in most romcoms we &quot;get to watch lovers overcome obstacles, work through issues of trust and commitment, see them triumph over class struggles, pride and prejudice, immaturity, distance, insecurity, jealousy, and so forth?&quot;  I&#039;d be up for a movie like that, but I don&#039;t feel like we ever see that.  In fact, I feel like romcoms have cornered the market on movies about love, so that we never see a realistic, more serious take on the topic.

Tia, well, I&#039;ve been dating for the last 10 or so years, so that explains most of it.  And no.  I would not be interested in a romcom with 2 talking dogs.  Marriage into the Harrison family doesn&#039;t mean you acquire the defective gene responsible for breaking into raucous laughter whenever a talking animal comes on the screen.  Oh, and the less said about the Milk Dud incident, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wade, The Breakup is one of the best.  Super funny, and I actually thought it was one of the few which realistically portrayed how relationships can be.  The argument about washing the dishes is one of my all time favorites.  &#8220;I&#8217;ll help you wash the dishes.&#8221;  &#8220;I want you to want to wash the dishes.&#8221;  &#8220;WHY WOULD I WANT TO WASH DISHES???&#8221;</p>
<p>Braden, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m with you on the super old movies being better.  A few of them are, but it seems like the fact that we&#8217;re seeing them means time has weeded out a bunch of lame ones.</p>
<p>Natalie,  I knew there had to be more.  Seems like there should be more still, though.</p>
<p>Erin, your comment made me laugh. I&#8217;m sure Judy does want to kiss Hugh Grant.  </p>
<p>Ryan, I hope Hitch learned the hard way that there&#8217;s no substituting Judy Greer when it comes to quirky romcom friends.</p>
<p>Anna, now you know the smoke alarm trick.  Just make sure you&#8217;re ready to defend your life.</p>
<p>Macy, I like your establishment of a new subgenre:  the progressive romcom.</p>
<p>Kook, so funny about Bugs Bunny.  I know exactly what you mean.  Anytime there was something risque on when mom and dad were in the room it felt like I had written, produced, and directed it.</p>
<p>Shannon, yes, you do need to say more.  I would recommend starting with the words, &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Joyce, I remember liking French Kiss a lot.  I&#8217;ll have to rent it next time my wife goes to a new, terrible romantic comedy.</p>
<p>Angie, the smoke alarm saved me before I saw that.  That is indeed more progressive than even 500 Days of Summer.  Can&#8217;t wait for the first Matthew McConagauh/Hugh Grant gay romcom.</p>
<p>Jenna, I agree, critics aren&#8217;t always spot on.  But there kind of all you have if you want to get an idea of what you&#8217;re getting into before spending the time and money.  </p>
<p>Maweesa, we&#8217;ll just have to agree to disagree.  Or get divorced.</p>
<p>Daniel, my wife came back from Dear John with &#8220;crying eyes.&#8221;  So it must have been pretty bad.</p>
<p>Norm, man, that video named about everyone that I did.  I feel like I plagiarized my post.</p>
<p>Nici, do you really feel like in most romcoms we &#8220;get to watch lovers overcome obstacles, work through issues of trust and commitment, see them triumph over class struggles, pride and prejudice, immaturity, distance, insecurity, jealousy, and so forth?&#8221;  I&#8217;d be up for a movie like that, but I don&#8217;t feel like we ever see that.  In fact, I feel like romcoms have cornered the market on movies about love, so that we never see a realistic, more serious take on the topic.</p>
<p>Tia, well, I&#8217;ve been dating for the last 10 or so years, so that explains most of it.  And no.  I would not be interested in a romcom with 2 talking dogs.  Marriage into the Harrison family doesn&#8217;t mean you acquire the defective gene responsible for breaking into raucous laughter whenever a talking animal comes on the screen.  Oh, and the less said about the Milk Dud incident, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tia</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>tia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>Whoa...someone found a hot topic alright. Davis, while I agree with everything you have said, I just have to say that I find it ironic how someone who so clearly hates MOST romcoms has obviously seen just about every single one that there is.  And many of the ones you mentioned were long before Melissa&#039;s time, so you can&#039;t really blame her for that. My question is this, if they made a romcom about two dogs who happened to talk, would you be interested in seeing that? Peter would.

And, as an aside, I just have to say that your previous post about blow pops totally reminded me of the milk duds incident and made me laugh. Sometimes a guys gotta do what a guys gotta do to get through the day, (or weekend if that&#039;s the case.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa&#8230;someone found a hot topic alright. Davis, while I agree with everything you have said, I just have to say that I find it ironic how someone who so clearly hates MOST romcoms has obviously seen just about every single one that there is.  And many of the ones you mentioned were long before Melissa&#8217;s time, so you can&#8217;t really blame her for that. My question is this, if they made a romcom about two dogs who happened to talk, would you be interested in seeing that? Peter would.</p>
<p>And, as an aside, I just have to say that your previous post about blow pops totally reminded me of the milk duds incident and made me laugh. Sometimes a guys gotta do what a guys gotta do to get through the day, (or weekend if that&#8217;s the case.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maweesa</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>maweesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>amen, nici.  

MM makes me want to puke, but back in the days of How to Lose a Guy, I kind of enjoyed him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen, nici.  </p>
<p>MM makes me want to puke, but back in the days of How to Lose a Guy, I kind of enjoyed him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nici</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Nici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>And for the record, Matthew Mcconaughey makes me want to puke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for the record, Matthew Mcconaughey makes me want to puke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nici</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1338</link>
		<dc:creator>Nici</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1338</guid>
		<description>Loved this post!  Yes, most of the stories we see in romantic comedies are absolutely plausible, though I could argue that all genres are formulaic.  I also agree that a lot of recent rom-coms (is that the new hot term?) have become nauseatingly shameless in the ways Davis described.  With the good ones though, I think that the delight is in watching two imperfect characters, who just so happen to be perfect for each other, figure out that they&#039;re perfect for each other. We get to watch lovers overcome obstacles, work through issues of trust and commitment, see them triumph over class struggles, pride and prejudice, immaturity, distance, insecurity, jealousy, and so forth.  The same things that infect our own real-life relationships, no?  Like mel said, they&#039;re simply entertaining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post!  Yes, most of the stories we see in romantic comedies are absolutely plausible, though I could argue that all genres are formulaic.  I also agree that a lot of recent rom-coms (is that the new hot term?) have become nauseatingly shameless in the ways Davis described.  With the good ones though, I think that the delight is in watching two imperfect characters, who just so happen to be perfect for each other, figure out that they&#8217;re perfect for each other. We get to watch lovers overcome obstacles, work through issues of trust and commitment, see them triumph over class struggles, pride and prejudice, immaturity, distance, insecurity, jealousy, and so forth.  The same things that infect our own real-life relationships, no?  Like mel said, they&#8217;re simply entertaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 15:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7lHJ7XkYAo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7lHJ7XkYAo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7lHJ7XkYAo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/2010/02/19/valentines-day/#comment-1329</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontdodumbthings.com/?p=1528#comment-1329</guid>
		<description>I saw The Proposal because my date had already seen Transformers 2 (it&#039;s probably for the best that I never got to see it), and enjoyed it.  The formula holds true. 

And I loved the Notebook, but only because of James Marsden&#039;s character, who had his engaged wife leave him and didn&#039;t do anything bitter.  But Nicholas Sparks really showed his masochistic tendencies when he wrote Dear John, with a plot only a Twilight fan could love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw The Proposal because my date had already seen Transformers 2 (it&#8217;s probably for the best that I never got to see it), and enjoyed it.  The formula holds true. </p>
<p>And I loved the Notebook, but only because of James Marsden&#8217;s character, who had his engaged wife leave him and didn&#8217;t do anything bitter.  But Nicholas Sparks really showed his masochistic tendencies when he wrote Dear John, with a plot only a Twilight fan could love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

